|
In setting aside the conviction on Wednesday, Superior Court Judge Hillary B. Strackbein ruled that the prosecution’s expert computer witness, a Norwich police detective, provided “erroneous” testimony about the classroom computer, according to an article in the Hartford Courant. She cited a forensic computer analysis conducted after the trial by the state police crime lab, which she said “contradicts testimony of the state’s computer witness.” Source: The Register |
Will someone please sue the ass off of the lying sack of crap that provided the false testimony and their superiors that encouraged permitted the testimony.
This is more than just a case of someone that decided to Speak Out Stupid. This is another instance of self serving scum misusing the legal system to advance their careers and egos. These slime need to be punished with both large fines and long jail time.
June 7, 2007 at 6:16 pm |
I agree. These fake cases smell of witch-hunting and detract from the neccessity of dealing with REAL sex offenders.